Legal Opinion

Richie v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1919No. 10246, 10247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Cartersville—Judge Aubrey. October 12, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

It appears to be conclusively settled that, notwithstanding the return of a second verdict in favor of the same party, the trial judge may still exercise his discretion in granting or refusing a new trial, though that discretion may not then be as ample as on the hearing of the motion for a first new trial (Morgan v. Lamb, 16 Ga. App. 484, and cases there cited, 85 S. E. 792) ; and under the particular, facts of the instant case the second grant of a new trial was not an abuse of the discretion vested in the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed on both bills of exceptions.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. LambCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Southern Insurance Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Jones v. StaplerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. Smith v. State Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API