Legal Opinion
In re T. M. Lesher & Son
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 1910No. 1,445PublishedCited by 11 opinions
In the matter of the bankruptcy of T. M. Lesher & Son. On petition to direct referee to certify question for review.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
On November 18, 1909, the referee rejected a claim that had been offered by the present petitioner, Andrew Radel, against the bankrupt estate. In order to obtain a review of the referee’s action," the petitioner should have asked for a *651certificate within 10 days, in conformity with the practice established for this district in December, 1904, by the following rule of court:
“Unless the j>etition be afterwards allowed by a judge of the District Court for cause shown after notice to opposing interests, a reviow of any action or order of a referee must be aslted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- In re Greek Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thummess v. Von HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
- Planters' Oil Co. v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.