Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. A 1983 Datsun 280ZX Sedan Vin Jnihz 04S0DX562727

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1990No. 19902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court, pursuant to a bench trial, denying the relief sought in appellant’s complaint for forfeiture.

Appellant brought a forfeiture action against the Datsun after the Datsun was used in the commission of a burglary. Both the owner of the car, and the owner’s son who committed the burglary, were required to submit answers in the proceedings below. The parties to the action below conceded that the owner had no knowledge of his son’s plans to use the Datsun in a burglary. NRS 179.121 (2)(b) provides;

*420A conveyance is not subject to…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Rio GrandeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. A Single Family ResidenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donoho v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. AGUIRRE, JR. v. ELKO CTY. SHERIFF'S OFFICENevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API