Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Berg
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 29, 2003No. 00-CV-1433PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
I. Background
The facts of this case were set forth in detail in a July 15, 2003 decision by this Court to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in some respects and deny the motion in others. Brooks v. Berg, 270 F.Supp.2d 302 (N.D.N.Y.2003). Following that decision, Defendants have filed a motion pursuant to Rule 54(B) to vacate the denial of summary judgment with respect to defendants Berg and Sen-kowsM and to permit those defendants to file a motion for summary judgment after the expiration of the dispositive motion deadline..
II.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Madeline E. Brown v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Kathleen M. Cifra v. General Electric Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, as Its SuccessorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Brooks v. BergDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kosilek v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Konitzer v. FrankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Fields v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010