Bishop v. Delano
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Action by James E. Bishop, administrator of the estate of Orville Bordner, deceased, against Frederick A. Delano, William K. Bixby, and Edward B. Pryor, receivers of the Wabash Railroad Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Circuit Judge.
At the first trial in the District Court, plaintiff in error had a verdict and judgment in his favor. On writ of error this court- reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial. Pryor v. Bishop, 234 Fed. 9, 148 C. C. A. 25.
At the second trial the evidence consisted of the transcript of the *264stenographic report of the testimony given at the first trial. Judgment on a directed verdict for defendant is now attacked on a second writ.
In connection with the first writ a bill of exceptions was presented, which consisted of a condensed statement of the evidence. The facts in that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pryor v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sassaman v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Milburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Kepner v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Laughlin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Smith v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.