Legal Opinion

Pasternack v. Muhl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination of respondent Superintendent of Insurance, dated May 23, 1996, revoking petitioner’s insurance broker and public adjuster licenses upon a finding of untrustworthiness and/or incompetency, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Jane Solomon, J.], entered October 2, 1996), dismissed, without costs.

The finding that petitioner allowed a revoked licensee to conduct an insurance brokerage business under his license is supported by substantial evidence,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gold v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Eich v. ShafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Systems Insurance Agency, Inc. v. State of New York Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Coulter v. State of N.Y. Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Keller v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. V.P. Management Corp. v. LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. V.P. Management Corp. v. LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API