Legal Opinion

Rex Shoe Company, Inc. v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of America

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 21, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6421PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

The sole issue here is whether the Patent Office correctly held that registration of the trademark “Thrill-mates” for “women’s and children’s shoes” is proscribed by Sec. 2(d)1 of the Lanham Act (Trade-Mark Act of 1946) in view of the opposer’s prior registration and use of “Foothrills” as a trademark for “Shoes, and Slippers of Leather or Kid.”

The facts are concisely summarized and the reasons supporting the decision below are clearly stated in the opinion of the Assistant Commissioner, acting for the Commissioner, from which we quote-as follows (114 USPQ 545):

“The record shows…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. I. T. S. Industria Tessuti Speciali v. Aerfab Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Owens-Illinois Glass Company v. Clevite CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. I. Posner, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Application of J. F. Marr Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API