Legal Opinion

Armijo v. Save 'N Gain

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. 10558Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 P.2d 989 (1989)

Yvette B. ARMIJO, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

SAVE 'N GAIN and Penn General Southwest, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10558.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

February 28, 1989.

Martin J. Chavez, Chavez Law Offices, Albuquerque, for claimant-appellant.

Ben M. Allen, Hatch, Beitler, Allen & Shepherd, P.A., Albuquerque, for respondents-appellees.

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Claimant, Yvette Armijo, appeals the denial of her motion seeking to reopen her worker's compensation claim for psychological disability in order to permit a formal hearing on the merits. The principal issue raised by claimant on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wammack v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API