Legal Opinion

In Re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Wright Metal, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Except in the situations provided for in the “ New York State Labor Relations Act ” contained in article 20 of the Labor Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 31), an “employee” in the sense of the statute “ means a mechanic, workingman or laborer working for another for hire” (§ 2, subd. 5). Emil N. Johnson, superintendent of the factory of the assignor-corporation, was not such an employee and was not entitled to be paid wages in accordance with section 196 of the statute. Hence, it was error to surcharge the appellant with the amount of Johnson’s claim ($1,531).

The orders should be modified in accordance…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tenalp Construction Corp. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. People v. RowanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API