Legal Opinion
Propper v. Clark
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 20, 1949No. 390Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
337 U.S. 472 (1949)
PROPPER, RECEIVER
v.
CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL.
No. 390.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 28-29, 1949.
Decided June 20, 1949.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
A. Walter Socolow and Joseph M. Cohen argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
David Schwartz argued the cause for Clark, Attorney General, respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Bazelon, James L. Morrisson and Joseph Laufer.
Louis D. Frohlich argued the cause and…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Reed; Dissent.
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.