Legal Opinion

Mirabella v. Amalgamated Insurance Fund

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 1, 1980Published

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Grace Mirabella, who had been a stitcher in the garment industry, applied for retirement benefits from the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (Fund) and was denied them for failure to meet eligibility criteria. From that denial, *635Mirabella sought relief. A judge sitting without a jury found that Mirabella had met the eligibility requirements of the Fund and judgment entered imposing joint and several liability on the Fund and the codefendant, Robert Lawrence Company, Inc., to pay benefits to Mirabella at the rate of $63.75 per month, retroactive to September 1, 1972, and for the remainder of her life.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Marlow v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Mike Gaydosh, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mike Gaydosh v. John L. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Joyce J. Beam v. International Organization of Masters, Mates, and PilotsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API