Legal Opinion

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 13, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-3306-OGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GASCH, Senior District Judge.

This case concerns the proper disposition of the residual assets of a terminated pension plan. Plaintiff Firestone Tire & Rubber Company (Firestone) challenges the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s (PBGC) rejection of Firestone’s proposed alternative method for calculating how much, if any, of the nine million dollars left in Firestone’s terminated pension fund is “attributable to employee contributions.” The issue presently before the Court, however, is proposed amicus curiae’s motion for appointment to advise the Court on the need for appointment of counsel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Delgrosso v. Spang & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API