Causin v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
This was an action of debt, determined in Jefferson Circuit Court, in April, 1841, before the Eon. Isaac Baker, one of the circuit judges. It was founded on a note executed by Causin, payable on demand, with legal interest thereon till paid. Declaration and writ against Gerard N. Causin. Judgment against G. N. Causin, for debt, and interest from the date of the note, as damages, by default.
Read the full summary
This was an action of debt, determined in Jefferson Circuit Court, in April, 1841, before the Eon. Isaac Baker, one of the circuit judges. It was founded on a note executed by Causin, payable on demand, with legal interest thereon till paid. Declaration and writ against Gerard N. Causin. Judgment against G. N. Causin, for debt, and interest from the date of the note, as damages, by default. There being an excess of two dollars in the calculation of damages, it was remitted, in this Court. There is no sufficient breach alleged. The contract is express to pay interest, and there is no…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Risco, C. J.
Every question presented by the record and assignment of errors, is within some of the principles adjudged by this Court, in either the case of Pullen vs. Chase, ante, or Davies vs. Gibson, 2 Ark. 115; and, according to the judgment of this Court, then expressed and still entertained, they must be, respectively, determined against the plaintiff in error.
Judgment affirmed, except as to the $2 remitted, with costs. .
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davies v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840