Legal Opinion

Ray v. Hilman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1934No. 2 Div. 48PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This appeal is from a final decree perpetually enjoining the appellant from trespassing upon the lands of complainants and cutting growing timber and removing same, to the detriment of the complainants’ estate.

Before the bill was filed, a dispute and controversy had arisen between the parties as to the right of the defendant to go on said land and cut and remove the timber, and prosecution had been instituted for trespass by defendant after warning. They thereupoiCen-tered into a written agreement, made Exhibit A to defendant’s answer and offered in evidence by her, setting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Hamilton v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Travis v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Smythe Lumber Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Compton v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Clark v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Eddins v. PopwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. In the Matter of NelsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API