Legal Opinion

State v. Sweeney

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 27, 2007No. AC 27449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Jeffrey Sweeney, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal trespass in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) admitted testimony and physical evidence concerning a box cutter, (2) admitted evidence of his prior, uncharged misconduct, (3) excluded evidence that he sought to admit to impeach a witness’ credibility, (4) charged the jury and (5) allowed the state to comment on a missing witness during final argument. We affirm the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GambleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. State v. BookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. State v. DayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API