Van Loan v. Van Loan
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentHolohan, Justice
The decision by the majority today condones a judgment of the Superior Court which amounts to the confiscation of the appellant’s separate property. It has been the law of this state from statehood that in a divorce action the Superior Court may not divest the parties of their separate property. This is confirmed in the current statute. A.R.S. § 25-318. The formula used by the Superior Court to provide a division of the appellant’s military retirement is fundamentally wrong and results in the loss of the appellant’s separate property.
The majority seek to ignore this important question on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- DeRevere v. DeRevereCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.