Commonwealth v. Bruno
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pomeroy :
While I subscribe to the opinion of Mr. Justice Eagen, speaking for the Court, I feel constrained, in light of the dissenting opinions, to mention additional considerations which have led me to this conclusion. The division of opinion relative to this appeal is not because of a conflict, or supposed conflict, between the rights of the accused on the one hand and the rights of society on the other, but because of disagreement concerning the interaction of two rights of the accused individual; the right to a fair trial, on the one hand, and the right to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.