Legal Opinion

Gilbride, Heller & Brown, PA v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 22, 2001No. SC00-657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

783 So.2d 224 (2001)

GILBRIDE, HELLER & BROWN, P.A., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Floyd WATKINS, Respondent.

No. SC00-657.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 22, 2001.

Pamela A. Chamberlin and Isaac J. Mitrani of Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky, Macaulay & Zorrilla, P.A., Miami, FL; and Pamela I. Perry and Michael Nachwalter of Kenny, Nachwalter, Seymour, Arnold, Critchlow & Spector, P.A., Miami, FL, for Petitioners.

Franklin L. Zemel and Teri L. Di Giulian of Broad and Cassel, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.

HARDING, J.

We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Silvestrone v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Watkins v. NCNB NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Wilson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Chapman by and Through Chapman v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Watkins v. GILBRIDE HELLER & BROWN, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Union National Bank v. TurneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Ginsberg v. ChemMED Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. ANDREW FRANKLIN RIERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API