In Re Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

OPINION

By LEMERT, J.

Earl Darling and Mary Darling, the appellants in the above described proceeding, who have appealed the decís-' ion of the Common Pleas Court (Conservancy Division) rendered December 5,1938, file this their assignment of errors as follows:

1. The court completely ignored the provisions of §8305, GC as to when judgments draw interest.

2. The decision as rendered does not grant to defendants their rights as defined by Art. I, Sec. 19, of the Constitution of Ohio, and the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

On February 26, 1936, there was filed in the office…