State v. Bakdash
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions of second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder, arguing that the district court erroneously included the doctrine of transferred intent in the jury instructions, he was denied due process because the indictment was constructively amended when the doctrine of transferred intent was advanced as a theory at trial but not before the grand jury, and the district court erroneously refused to order disclosure of the full grand jury transcript. We affirm.
FACTS
On April 25, 2011, appellant Timothy Ayman Bakdash was charged with one…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- United Kingdom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Michael MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Jimmy Rogers Aketachunak v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Pierre Scott GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015