Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Tasanilla Hopson v. Delores Palmer Hopson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 20, 1955No. 11558_1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

STEPHENS, Chief Judge.,

(concurring in the result in part, dissenting in part).

For the reasons set forth below, I concur in the result reached by this court in its affirmance of the acceptance of jurisdiction by the District Court. Otherwise, I dissent from the decision of the court.

*848This appeal involves a maintenance action ir. the District Court by the ap-pellee, Mrs. Hopson, against the appellant, her husband, for support monies for hers elf, and for Dewane Hopson, a minor child of the parties. The suit also involved the custody of Dewane Hopson, which was awarded by the District Court to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API