In Re Houser's Estate
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentPollock, District Judge
I respectfully dissent. It is a well-established rule that proof of the terms of an oral contract to devise or bequeath must be clear, satisfactory, and unequivocal. Dunbier v. Stanton, 170 Neb. 541, 103 N. W. 2d 797; Gerdes v. Omaha Home for Boys, 166 Neb. 574, 89 N. W. 2d 849; McLaughlin v. Heath, 164 Neb. 511, 82 N. W. 2d 533; Drew v. Hawley, 164 Neb. 141, 82 N. W. 2d 4; Wyrick v. Wyrick, 162 Neb. 105, 75 N. W. 2d 376; O’Neal v. First Trust Co., 160 Neb. 469, 70 N. W. 2d 466; Eagan v. Hall, 159 Neb. 537, 68 N. W. 2d 147.
There was no proof of mutual assent, of a meeting of the minds, of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gerdes v. Omaha Home for BoysNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Dunbier's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- O'Neal v. First Trust Company of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Eagan v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Drew v. HawleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.