Legal Opinion

Hardeman & Hamilton v. Ford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1852No. 35PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Dooly Superior Court. Tried before Judge Powers. April Term, 3852. This was an action to recover back money, advanced by the plaintiffs, Hardeman & Hamilton, as cotton factors, to Ford, the defendant. Plaintiffs proved-the advancement of the money as charged in their account, and that they had sold twenty-three bales of cotton for defendant, at 7|-cents, which left a balance due them from defendant.

Read the full summary

In Dooly Superior Court. Tried before Judge Powers. April Term, 3852. This was an action to recover back money, advanced by the plaintiffs, Hardeman & Hamilton, as cotton factors, to Ford, the defendant. Plaintiffs proved-the advancement of the money as charged in their account, and that they had sold twenty-three bales of cotton for defendant, at 7|-cents, which left a balance due them from defendant. They had sold the cotton in New York, March 13, 1848. The defendant introduced Robert G. Ford, who testified that the cotton was stored with plaintiffs in July, 1847; on which they agreed to…

1Opinion of the Court

£y the Court.

Warner, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The motion for a new trial was properly overruled by the Court below, on the statement of facts contained in this record. The cotton was delivered to the plaintiffs in July, 1847, to be shipped to Savannah, but not to JVew York. The plaintiffs were specially directed by the defendant, not to send his cotton to New York; said “his cotton never should go on the water, as he had suffered once by his cotton going on the water.” The plaintiffs shipped the cotton toNewYork, and it was sold in that market, on the 13th March, 1848, at 7J cents.…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Wheeler v. Northwestern Sleigh Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1889
  3. Cutcliffe v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. State v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Southeastern Fidelity Fire Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API