Legal Opinion

Luis v. Church of St. Angela Merici

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapozzoli, J.

The facts are fully set forth by our dissenting colleague and I shall confine this writing to the law involved.

It is settled law that the issue of proximate cause presents a question of fact for the jury and, of course, must be decided on the particular facts of each case. As was said by the court in Selleck v Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1 (276 App Div 263, 267):

"Whether the failure of the defendants in these respects was a proximate cause of the accident is an issue over which reasonable minds might differ, and hence an issue of fact arose which was for the jury to resolve.”

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoose v. S. S. DrummNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Applebaum v. B.E. of the City N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Feuerstein v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bodner v. SteinhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Gaile v. CilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Homer v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API