Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Chas. Kohlman & Co. v. Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1924Published

1Per curiam

Upon this reargument it is urged by the Attorney-General that an important point was presented by him upon the former argument, which it is claimed was overlooked by us and which, if well considered, would require a confirmation of the determination of the State Tax Commission. We have annulled the determination and remitted the proceeding to the Commission for the taking of further testimony in accordance with the views expressed in our opinion accompanying our former decision. (207 App. Div. 93.) The claim is further made by the Attorney-General that a rehearing cannot be granted in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. the Panama Railroad v. Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People Ex Rel. Edward & John Burke, Ltd. v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People Ex Rel. Town of Hempstead v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. People ex rel. Brooklyn El. Railroad v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People ex rel. Chas. Kohlman & Co. v. LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API