Dailey v. Kinsler
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant Catherine Kinsler from a decree of the district court of Douglas county. *836Judgment was entered at the January, 1891, term affirming the decree below. (See Dailey v. Kinsler, 31 Neb., 340.) Subsequently, however, on the motion of the appellant, a rehearing was allowed. The reliance of the appellant at this time is upon two propositions, viz.:
First — That the original petition did not. state a cause of action against Feeney, her co-defendant, hence the question of title in him to the property in controversy was not concluded by the decree of the district court.
S…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowman v. GriffithNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- McDonald & Co. v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Rickards v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Dailey v. KinslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Midland Co. v. BroatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Grover, Inc. v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Purdom Naval Stores Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1907
- First National Bank v. Blair State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.