Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Kinsler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Catherine Kinsler from a decree of the district court of Douglas county. *836Judgment was entered at the January, 1891, term affirming the decree below. (See Dailey v. Kinsler, 31 Neb., 340.) Subsequently, however, on the motion of the appellant, a rehearing was allowed. The reliance of the appellant at this time is upon two propositions, viz.:

First — That the original petition did not. state a cause of action against Feeney, her co-defendant, hence the question of title in him to the property in controversy was not concluded by the decree of the district court.

S…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. GriffithNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McDonald & Co. v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Rickards v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Dailey v. KinslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Midland Co. v. BroatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Grover, Inc. v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Purdom Naval Stores Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1907
  5. First National Bank v. Blair State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API