Legal Opinion

Peters v. Hood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1884No. 2890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Hood County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White, P. J.

(Transferred from Austin. J

§ 3 7 6. Heirs; suit against may be maintained by creditor of estate, without administration, when; case stated. Hood instituted suit in justice’s court against Peters and others, upon a promissory note executed to him by one Sarah Bond for $135. He shed defendants as the heirs of said Sarah Bond, who had died since the execution of the note, claiming that they, the heirs of said decedent, had taken possession of, and distributed among themselves, all the property of said decedent. The note sued on was executed October 7, 1879. Sarah Bond died…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. RugelyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Frederick L. v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McCampbell v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Patterson v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. State v. LewellynTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Executors of Thomas v. Executors of ErvinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API