Legal Opinion

Frieder v. Adlerman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, seventh district, in his favor in the sum of $309, in a trial before the court without a jury, and the defendant appeals from so much of said judgment as awards the plaintiff the sum of $309.

1Opinion of the Court

Cohalan,

J. Plaintiff, an attorney at law, brought this action upon an assignment of a judgment, against the Chelsea Exchange Bank, to recover the sum of $533. The defendant, a receiver in supplementary proceedings, claimed the same fund, and thereafter, by an order of interpleader, the money was paid into court, and the receiver substituted as defendant for the Chelsea Exchange Bank.

The facts are practically conceded. On August 30, 1915, the plaintiff was retained by Joseph Doelger’s Sons to commence an action to recover a penalty *260against the Chelsea. Exchange Bank. It was agreed in writing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zogbaum v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Droege v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. In re Application of HavemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reisman v. Independence Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API