Legal Opinion

Consumers' Glue Co. v. Samuel Bingham's Son Manufacturing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — -Hem. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. (1) Before a purchaser is entitled to recover lost profits 'which he might have made if the vendor had not failed to deliver the g’oods, he must show a valid sub-sale in contemplation of the parties at the time the original sale was contracted. G-uetzskow Bros. Co. v. Andrews & Co., 92 Wis. 214; Wilson v. Russler, 91 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — -Hem. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. (1) Before a purchaser is entitled to recover lost profits 'which he might have made if the vendor had not failed to deliver the g’oods, he must show a valid sub-sale in contemplation of the parties at the time the original sale was contracted. G-uetzskow Bros. Co. v. Andrews & Co., 92 Wis. 214; Wilson v. Russler, 91 Mo. App. 275. (2) A sale like any other agreement, to amount to a contract, must be certain in its terms. This is necessary in order to make a valid sub-sale. Stout v. Hardware Co., 131 Mo. App. 535; Lynch…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This is an action for the breach by defendant of a contract for the sale by defendant to plaintiff of certain “old composition” taken from used printers’ rollers. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff below for $350 and the case is here on defendant’s appeal.

On or about November 27, 1912, defendant entered into a contract with plaintiff whereby defendant agreed to sell and plaintiff agreed to buy an ac*93cumulation of material spoken of as “old composition,” being a mixture of various things pressed into rollers for printing presses, and having been taken from used and discarded…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warren v. A. B. Mayer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Hammond v. BeesonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Trigg v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  4. McKay v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Mark v. H. D. Williams Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hefernan v. NeumondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API