Legal Opinion

State v. Hurla

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 2002No. 87,852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

The State appeals from the dismissal of a criminal complaint.

The facts may be summarized as follows. On May 19, 1999, two motorcycles were stolen from a Topeka cycle shop. On September 17, 1999, the State filed a complaint against John M. Hurla charging burglary of a nondwelling (K.S.A. 21-3715[b]), felony theft (K.S.A. 21-3701[a]), and criminal damage to property (K.S.A. 21-3720[a][1]). On October 18, 1999, the parties entered into a diversion agreement. The agreement had a 24-month term and was set on the court’s October 3, 2001,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. State v. VergeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BerrethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Gates v. GoodyearCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. In re E.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API