Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 24, 1998No. 97-597PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
In this interlocutory appeal, see SUP. CT. R. 8, the defendant, Eric Anderson, challenges the ruling of the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) denying his motion to bar prosecution for attempted criminal trespass on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm and remand.
In October 1996, the defendant was charged with one count of criminal trespass. See RSA 635:2 (1996). The complaint alleged that the defendant, on October 12, 1996, did “[kjnowingly enter and remain on the [p]roperty [s]ituated ... in said Nashua, the said Eric R. Anderson [k]nowing that he was not [licensed nor [p]rivileged to do so.”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hegg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CoppolaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WoodardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. NicklesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Alwyn v. DuvalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Hammell v. WardenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001