Legal Opinion

Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Duskin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1955No. 35666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The plaintiff contends that Mrs. Duskin was liable as a partner for the debts of Dawson Milling Company. This contention is based upon the rule that promoters of a corporation who are granted a charter, but make no effort to accept the charter by complying with its requirements, will be held liable as partners if they go forward with the business.

The plaintiff’s position is that Mrs. Duskin was a promoter, and that she took part in the business of Dawson Milling Company and therefore is liable as a partner.

That Mrs. Duskin, her husband and son jointly filed a petition and obtained a charter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooke v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Tollison-Davenport Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Reid v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API