Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Rasul
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 11, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs, defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgments is denied, and the judgments are reinstated.
In this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained as a result of a June 15, 2008 motor vehicle accident, defendant moved to vacate two default judgments which had been entered against him. The affidavit of the process server stated that, after three attempts at service on defendant at his dwelling place, defendant had been served in February 2010 by means of affixing the summons and endorsed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gartner v. Unified Windows, Doors & Siding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kalamadeen v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Jackson v. Professional Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Campoverde v. ParejasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.