Legal Opinion

Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. Town of Penfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff brings this action for a judgment declaring that the Town of Penfield’s sign ordinance passed in 1970, as it affected plaintiff’s property, was confiscatory, unconstitutional and ultra vires because it attempted to regulate in an area pre-empted by the State of New York. Special Term dismissed its complaint for legal insufficiency, found that the town ordinance was constitutional and the area of road signs it regulated had not been pre-empted by the State. Plaintiff alleged that it erected nine billboards in the Town of Penfield…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. Town of PenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Corsetti v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HenriettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API