Legal Opinion

W. O. Hilton, and Wife, Malvirin Hilton v. The Atlantic Refining Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1964No. 20305_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a ruling denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to remand to the state court. The motion was based on the theory that there are certain indispensable parties, citizens of Texas, who could and, therefore, must be joined as parties defendant and whose joinder would destroy diversity and, therefore, the jurisdiction of the federal court.

Appellants, Texas residents, filed suit in a Texas district court, naming it a suit for removal of a cloud on their title to a certain eighty acres.

While denominated a suit to remove cloud, the claim of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Hudson v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hs Resources, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Jim R. Wingate, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dorothy Evans Anderson Etc. v. Dr. M. L. MoorerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Union Pac. RR v. City of PalestineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  5. Coppolino v. HelpernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API