Legal Opinion

Decatur Transit v. City of Gadsden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1947No. 7 Div. 922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The City, of Gadsden legally adopted a license schedule for the year 1946, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

“Each person, firm, corporation or motor transportation company who unloads, delivers, distributes or disposes of any goods, wares, merchandise or produce in the City of Gadsden, which said goods, wares, merchandise or produce was transported from a point without the City of Gadsden — per year $100.00”

Decatur Transit is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Alabama, and in every way qualified to engage in the business as a contract…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Colvin v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Town of Guntersville v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Sanford v. City of ClantonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. City of Enterprise v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Al Means, Inc. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. City of Decatur v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. City of Hartselle v. Baggett Transp. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API