Legal Opinion

King v. Lejko

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1931No. Appeal 67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We think the plaintiff’s statement sufficiently set forth that the prosecution for larceny, which formed the basis for this action, was begun and carried on maliciously and without probable cause. It averred that the complaint was made pursuant to a conspiracy on the part of the defendants “maliciously to prosecute the plaintiff without foundation in fact for said charge;” that the charge was false; the plaintiff’s arrest and imprisonment and his discharge by the magistrate; and “that said arrest was unwarranted and wholly without basis in fact. ’ ’ In Farmer v. Darling,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAleer v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Brobst v. RuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Quick v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Weinberger v. ShellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. Beihofer v. LoeffertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Jones v. MacConochieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API