Legal Opinion
Scott v. Hoover
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Decided January 15, 1900No. 872PublishedCited by 3 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
A demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was interposed March 24, 1899. Thereafter, May 29, 1899, defendant filed an answer containing various pleas to the merits, and alSo the following:
“The plaintiffs ought not to be permitted to maintain this action in this court, for that the defendant was not at the time of the commencement of said action, is not now, and never has been, a resident and inhabitant of the Southern district of California, hut that at all of said times the defendant was, and is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Central Trust Co. v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
- White v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903