Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2007No. 2006-2341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0074348, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 2001.

{¶ 2} On April 21, • 2006, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct. Respondent filed an answer to the complaint, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline held a hearing on the complaint in September 2006. The panel then prepared written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommended sanction, all of which the board adopted.

Misconduct

Count I

{¶ 3} In early…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JaffeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Muskingum County Certified Grievance Committee v. GreenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrdinaOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KrausOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. KizerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KrausOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API