Legal Opinion

Payne v. Teague

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1922No. 806PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a suit for damages against appellant by plaintiff, Elsie M. Teague, joined pro forma by her husband, Henry M. Teague, for an assault which she alleged was committed on her person by one David McReynolds a special officer in the employment of appellant. The trial was to a jury, and on their verdict judgment was entered against appellant in the sum of $3,-500.

Refusal of the court to give a peremptory charge in favor of appellant forms the basis of the only assignment of error presented on this appeal. Appellant say the refusal of this charge involves two issues;

“(1) Was the servant of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Dillingham v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. ParsonsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hamiter v. State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Davis v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API