Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McKinnell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1914No. 8064PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Marvin H. Brown, Judge. Action by Harry D. McKinnell against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

As a result of a collision between two trains operated by the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company near the town of Davis, Okl., Harry L. McKinnell, a railway mail agent, who was riding on one of those trains, sustained personal injuries, and he instituted this suit against the company to recover damages therefor. He recovered judgment for the sum of $6,500, and the company has appealed.

[1 ] As one of the grounds stated in the defendant’s motion for new trial, it was alleged, in substance, that the jury during their retirement for the purpose of reaching a verdict improperly considered…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flores v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API