Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lafferty v. Nickel

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1983No. 5758Published

1Concurrence

THOMAS, Justice,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result of this case as announced in the majority opinion. I would prefer, however, that the court espouse for such instances a tolling rule with respect to the statute of limitations because it seems to me that there is a likelihood of situations arising in which the accused person would be foreclosed by the doctrines of res judica-ta and collateral estoppel from pursuing his civil action by virtue of a criminal conviction which ultimately might be set aside. If that reversal occurred after the statute of limitations for his civil action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API