Hatfield v. Farnum
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Ford District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
Itheal P. Farnum brought this action before a justice of the peace to recover from Hatfield & Smith $132.65, for merchandise sold and delivered to them. Attached to the bill of particulars was an account, the correctness of which was duly verified by affidavit. Hatfield &- Smith answered by a bill of particulars, which admitted the correctness of Farnum’s account, but stated that he was indebted to' them in the sum of $216.90, which they claimed.. They alleged that, at the time they became indebted to Farnum, he and two other persons were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunn v. West & HackleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845
- Newell v. Salmons & WashburnNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Carson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- Redman & Fear v. Malvin & CloudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Baughman v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lawson v. Lawrence Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932