Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Schmidt

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At chambers. Motion for allowance" of costs. Action by Charles H. Bailey and others against Louise M. Schmidt and others, for the value of professional services.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The plaintiffs presented a claim for professional services to the defendants, against the estate of the decedent, amounting to the sum of $770.88. The claim, being disputed, was, by consent, referred, and the referee found for the plaintiffs in the sum.óf $463, thus very materially reducing the plaintiffs’ claim. By his report it appears that $450 of the amount allowed was for professional services, and that$13, balance thereof, was for disbursements incurred by the plaintiffs. The referee reports that the claimants are entitled to judgment for the amount reported, besides the costs of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Healy v. MurphyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API