Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is an action of tort in two counts under the R. L. c. 106, § 71, clauses 1 and 2. At the trial in the Superior Court, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the case is before us on the defendant’s exceptions.

The injury occurred on March 16, 1904. The plaintiff at this time was seventeen years old. He had worked as a printing press feeder for two years before entering the defendant’s employ, and had worked for the defendant in the *41same capacity for three or four weeks before the day of the accident. On that day, after working on another press, he was set to work on the press…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mooney v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Murphy v. Marston Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Gregory v. American Thread Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Kenneson v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Ross v. Pearson Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Ryan v. Fall River Iron Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Chiuccariello v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Curtin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API