Legal Opinion

Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1959No. 34606PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of a boiler and machinery insurance policy, and a review of the evidence concerning a loss sustained by the plaintiff in its lumbermill when a spoke of a bandsaw wheel was broken. The trial court found that the breaking of the spoke was within the coverage of the policy, and that as a result of the accident, a time loss of thirteen days was sustained. The trial court having found for the plaintiff, the evidence must be construed in its favor.

Under the terms of the policy, in so far as the claim involved in this case is concerned, the insurer was bound…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lesamiz v. Lawyers Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. New Castle County v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. KEY TRONIC CORPORATION, INC. v. Aetna (CIGNA) Fire Underwriters Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API