Legal Opinion

Langeman Manufacturing Ltd. v. Pinnacle West Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 28, 2007No. 07-cv-00411-bbcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

In this civil action for monetary and injunctive relief, plaintiff Langeman Manufacturing Ltd contends that defendants infringed three patents that it owns, U.S. Patent No. 6,284,319 (the '319 patent), U.S. Patent No. 6,875,469 (the '469 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 7,014,900 (the '900 patent). All three patents relate to edge trimming tape.

Now before the court is defendant Zefr Composites’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction over it…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API