Legal Opinion

Trayser Piano Co. v. Kirschner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Action by the appellee against the appellant. Finding and judgment for the plaintiff. The assignments *184of error are predicated on the action of the court in overruling the demurrers of the appellant to the respective paragraphs of the amended complaint, its motion to have the plaintiff required to make some of the paragraphs more specific, and its motion for a new trial, to each of which rulings exception was taken.

Counsel for the appellant has made no argument or suggestion in reference to the motion for a new trial. We are therefore relieved from considering it. There is, too, no question…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terre Haute, Etc., Traction Co. v. McDermottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Gerard v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Kinmore v. CresseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Meyer v. Garvin, ReceiverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. McDermottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API