Legal Opinion

Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 9, 1969No. 21451PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of rape after a second trial for the instant offense. 1 While his principal defense at trial was alibi, he contends on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of prosecutrix as to the corpus delicti, and that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that such evidence was required, although no such instruction was requested by trial counsel.

We think there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to corroborate the prosecutrix’ testimony, compensating for the lack of clear medical evidence of forcible penetration. The victim’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Ewing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Frank W. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re J. W. Y.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. David A. WileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API