Lane v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Chancery. Case 143 Error to the Madison Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
It is apparent from the evidence in this record, that Lane acted, for six or eight years or more, as the agent of Coleman in the preparation and management of a very burthensome litigation, in which he incurred great personal trouble as well as expense. It is obvious too, that his services were highly useful and must have been rendered by some one in the character of agent, as Coleman was entirely incompetent himself, and seems ' *570to have done nothing in the active conduct of the suits, and his attorneys seem not only to have recognized Lane, but to have depended on him in the sphere of the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Muscogee Lumber Co. v. HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Reed v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875